检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国科学院大气物理研究所大气科学和地球流体力学数值模拟国家重点实验室,北京100029 [2]中国科学院研究生院
出 处:《大气科学》2007年第6期1102-1112,共11页Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences
基 金:中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目KZCX3-SW-230;国家自然科学基金NO.40675030
摘 要:针对适应性观测中敏感性区域的确定问题,考虑初始误差对预报结果的影响,比较了条件非线性最优扰动(CNOP)与第一线性奇异向量(FSV)在两个降水个例中的空间结构的差异,考察了它们总能量范数随时间发展演变的异同。结合敏感性试验的分析,揭示了预报结果对CNOP类型的初始误差的敏感性要大于对FSV类型的初始误差的敏感性,因而减少初值中CNOP类型误差的振幅比减少FSV类型的收益要大。这一结果表明可以把CNOP方法应用于适应性观测来识别大气的敏感区。关于将CNOP方法有效地应用于适应性观测所面临的挑战及需要采取的对策等也进行了讨论。This study is concerned with the applicability of conditional optimal perturbation (CNOP) to the determination of sensitivity area in adaptive observation. MM5 (Mesoscale Model 5) model and its adjoint form are utilized to study the effects of initial errors on the forecasts of two precipitation cases in July 2003 and in August 1996. The authors compare the differences between the structures of the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations (CNOPs) and the first linear singular vectors (FSVs), and calculate the developments of their total energies. It is found that the structures of CNOPs differ much from those of FSVs as well as the developments of their total energies. The results of sensitivity experiments indicate that the forecast results are more sensitive to the CNOP-type initial errors than the FSV-type ones. This suggests that the forecast results benefit more from the reductions of the CNOP-type initial errors than the reductions of the FSV-type ones. This indicates that it is feasible to use CNOP for the deter-mination of sensitivity area in adaptive observation. The authors also discuss the problems that may be confronted in applying CNOPs to adaptive observation and the potential solutions.
关 键 词:适应性观测 敏感性区域 条件非线性最优扰动 第一奇异向量
分 类 号:P456[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.137.25