两种实验教学理念的比较  

The comparison between two different experimental teaching concepts

作　　者：孙尔康[1] 张剑荣[1] 张家玫[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学国家级化学实验教学示范中心,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《实验技术与管理》2007年第11期3-4,共2页Experimental Technology and Management

基　　金：“江苏省新世纪高等教育教学改革工程”重点项目的子项目“以人为本的教学实验室建设、管理的探索与实践”的研究成果之一部分(该项目是江苏省教育厅2004年6月21日的特批项目)

摘　　要：由于历史的原因，中国高校长期以来，受重理论、轻实验的影响，实验教学提倡以培养学生的三基能力为主，培养出来的学生虽有较系统的基础知识和规范的实验操作能力，但缺乏活力，不利于学生创新能力的培养。新的教学理念在继承传统教学理念的基础上提出实验教学以学生为主体，教师为主导。这有利于学生个性、特长的发展，有利于学生创新能力的培养。Due to the historical prejudice, emphasizing theoreties and neglecting practice exist in domestic universities and colleges for a long time, while experimental teaching always focuses on the training of students in basic technology, basic theory and basic experimental method, the mastery of systemic knowledge and the canonical experimental operation. However, without energy interest and vigor, it would go against the cultivation of students＇ innovative capacity. Therefore, the new teaching concept, on the basis of succeeding to the conventional teaching conceptation, indicates experimental teaching ought to treat students as principal parts and make teachers leading roles. This reform not only is favorable to the development of students＇ character and merit, but also has an ideal effect on cultivation of individual innovative capacity.

关 键 词：教学理念 主体 主导 创新能力 

分 类 号：G642.423[文化科学—高等教育学]