检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺寿南[1]
出 处:《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2007年第6期40-43,共4页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:人们规避国家制定法而偏好"私了"并不一定是一种不懂法的表现,而是对"私了"进行博弈逻辑分析后所作出的一种理性选择。从博弈论的观点分析了"私了"存在的经济根源,并从逻辑学的角度详细探究了"私了"现象所产生的社会根源和其它原因,提出应在法律的许可限度内,允许公民在一定规则和司法的合理引导下,通过"私了"的理性协商、沟通和对话解决问题,使公民合理地享有私权自治处理纠纷的权利与可能。It is not necessarily unknown to law that people evade law and like "Private Settlement of Legal Problerns". It is a rational selection after people have analyzed it. This paper analyzes the economic reasons that such a phenomenon has long existed are investigated from the game perspective. Besides, the social roots for it are clarified from logic. It is proposed that civilians should be allowed, as long as law permits, to settle legal problems privately on the basis of negotiation, communication and dialogue under proper institutional and judicial guidance. In this case, every Chinese citizen can enjoy the right of claiming and disposing personal disputes freely on a reasonable basis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249