检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《当代经济科学》2007年第6期79-87,共9页Modern Economic Science
摘 要:司法公正与法官激励是当前司法领域中所面临的最为紧迫而关键的问题。本研究运用博弈论来模拟现实的审判过程。通过分析基于个人效用最大化的法官最优选择的基础上来研究法官的法律遵从度、工作勤勉程度、工资收入、外部干预(如贿赂)、司法权的有效配置等重要因素对法官裁判的影响,进而解决社会所获得的公正执法水平。对于不同法律遵从度的法官而言,贿赂、工资等因素的影响是不同的。提高法官法律遵从度并调整法官与社会之间的效用关系,从制度上实现司法权的有效配置,对于实现司法公正至关重要。这为解决当前司法领域所存在的问题提供了理论依据和方法。Judicial fairness and judiciary incentives are the most urgent and critical problems in judge area.This study uses game theory to simulate real trial process.For optimal judiciary choice based on maximum personal utility,we study the relationships between the following factors: judicial fairness and compliance degree with law,work diligence,income,effective allocation of judging rights,and external intervention.Judges for the different legal compliance,bribery,wages and other factors are different.The allocation of judging rights affect the social utility.Independent exclusive judging rights as the incentive mechanism and introduce incentive mechanisms in institutional arrangements are very important for establishment control rights incentives to accomplish social fairness.This solution to the current problems in the judicial field has provided a theoretical basis and methodology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117