检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学中国社会稳定与危机管理研究中心,重庆400031
出 处:《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2007年第6期2-8,共7页Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金项目"社会转型时期的群体性事件"(05BSH009)
摘 要:本文对全国农村抽样调查数据的分析表明,地处城郊或乡村、交通状况对村治的影响不显著;东部、中部与西部地区农村在村治方面无显著差异,但东部农村治理的民主程度略强些,更倾向于"海选"、财务公开周期短,不过村支书在其中多数村掌控财权。经济因素对村治有显著的影响,在经济发展程度较高的村,民主治理的程度较高,这在一定程度上印证了经济发展对民主发展的正相关理论。With nearly 20-year development, how about the implementation of village self-governance system in China? The findings, according to correlation and regression analysis of this paper are: of the factors effecting village self-governance, geographic location, regional types and traffic situation haven' t obvious impact, but economic factors have significant effect. Results show that degree of village selfgovernance in eastern area is a little higher than other areas, which is inclined to "sea election", where its financial affairs opening has short cycles and the village branch secretary of the Party is in control of the authority of finance in most villages. It also provides evidence for positive correlation between economy development and democracy development in some degree.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3