检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王显红[1] 周晓农[1] 李远林 吕山[1] 李兰花[1] 贾铁武[1] 陈绍荣 杨忠 方文 陈凤
机构地区:[1]中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所,200025 [2]云南省大理州血吸虫病防治研究所,671000
出 处:《中国卫生统计》2007年第4期361-363,共3页Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
基 金:国家自然科学基金重大项目(编号30590373);联合国儿童基金会/联合国开发署/世界银行/世界卫生组织热带病研究与培训特别规划署资助项目(TDRA30298)
摘 要:目的探讨估计日本血吸虫感染两种检测方法(ELISA和Kato-Katz)在现场应用时的灵敏度和特异度的新方法。方法采用贝叶斯(Bayes)统计方法,利用2005年云南省洱源县现场调查资料,对两种方法在流行区和非流行区应用时的检测效果分别进行了评价。结果在流行区,ELISA灵敏度较高(0.913,中位数,下同)而特异度较低(0.584),Kato-Katz法灵敏度低(0.148)而特异度很高(0.994);在非流行区,ELISA灵敏度为0.766,特异度为0.908,Kato-Katz法灵敏度和特异度与其在流行区的相似。结论在无金标准的情况下,Bayes方法能够对检测方法做出科学的评价。Objective To explore a novel approach to estimate the sensitivities and specificities of two tests, i. e., ELISA and Kato - Katz, for detecting schistosoma japonicum infection when used in the field. Methods A Bayesian approach was employed to evaluate the characteristics of the two tests when used in endemic and non - endemic areas, respectively, based on the data from the field investigation in Eryuan county of Yunnan province, 2005. Results In endemic areas, a high sensitivity with the median of 0. 913 and a low specificity with the median of 0. 584 preserited in ELISA, and a low sensitivity with the median of 0. 148 along with a very high specificity(0. 994) appeared in Kato - Katz. In non - endemic areas, a moderate sensitivity of 0. 766 with a high specmcity(0. 908) was showed in ELISA, and the sensitivity and specificity of Kato - Katz was similar to that in endemic areas, respectively. Conclusion The Bayesian approach can evaluate the test pmpenies appropriately when there is no gold standard.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229