原子吸收法和甲醛肟法检测发锰含量结果的对比  

Comparison between Atomic Absorption Method and Formaldehyde Method in Determining Manganese Contents in Hair

作　　者：闫震[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省徐州市疾病预防控制中心,221006

出　　处：《职业与健康》2007年第24期2266-2267,共2页Occupation and Health

摘　　要：目的研究确定火焰原子吸收法替代甲醛肟法测定发锰的可行性。方法取不同锰含量的头发样品,分别进行火焰原子吸收法和甲醛肟法检测,对结果进行对比。结果这2种方法检测结果的配对t检验,t=0.286,P>0.05。其结果差异无统计学意义。结论火焰原子吸收法在发锰的检测中可以替代甲醛肟法。[ Objective] To explore the feasibility of using flame atomic absorption method instead of formaldehyde method to determine manganese in hair. [Methods] 20 hair samples with different manganese contents were collected and determined with the two methods ; the results were eompared. [ Results] No significant difference was found in the result （ P 〉 0.05）. [ Conclusion] Formaldehyde method can be used to replace flame atomic absorption method in the determination of manganese in hair.

关 键 词：火焰原子吸收法 甲醛肟法 检测 发锰 

分 类 号：R115[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]