检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南科技大学,四川绵阳621010
出 处:《西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2007年第6期1-6,共6页Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
摘 要:法律方法论是人们认知法律之根本,同时也是法律人构建法治社会的基石。近年,随着哲学诠释学观念的影响,法律方法或法学方法的研究日渐兴隆,引起了法律界和法学界的关切与重视。事实上,法治的成熟直接依赖于法律方法或法治方法,而法律方法论或法学方法论的缺失一直是我国法治或法学建设长期停滞不前的主因之一,要改变现状必须加强法律(解释)方法的研究与应用,因此,从法律解释方法的概念、特性、功能进行分析和研究是具有一定现实意义的。Legal methodology is not only the root for legal cognizance, but also the foundation stone for legal persons to build a society by law. In recent years, with the development of influence on Philosophy Hermeneutics, researches on legal method or law method have increased rapidly, which has attracted the attention of the legal groups and law groups. Indeed the maturation of a society under rule of law directly depends on the legal method or law method, but the faultiness of legal methodology and law methodology is the main reason for the stagnancy of the construction of our national nomocracy and law. Therefore, it is of some practical significance to make an analysis and research on the concept, characteristics and function of legal interpretation methodology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28