认知共同体与亚太地区第二轨道外交  

The Epistemic Community and Track-Two Diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific Region

作　　者：喻常森[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院

出　　处：《世界经济与政治》2007年第11期33-39,共7页World Economics and Politics

摘　　要：传统现实主义理论倾向于从大国关系等结构性因素来探讨国际合作,而领导权是决定合作成败的关键。鉴于亚太地区主要大国之间关系存在严重不信任状态和安全结构的多元性,使得地区多边安全合作进程出现结构性领导权的缺失。在这种情况下,作为亚太地区安全领域的认知共同体——"第二轨道外交",凭借其对多边安全领域的知识权威,对官方的安全政策决策产生积极影响,从而有利于地区认同的建构和合作制度的建立,并可以在一定程度上弥补因领导权缺失带来的制度疲软现象。作者拟以建构主义的认知共同体理论为分析框架,通过东盟战略与国际研究所和亚太安全合作理事会两个典型案例,探讨第二轨道外交在亚太地区多边安全合作进程中的认知建构和政策决策作用。As an example of constructivism theory in international studies, epistemism supposes that common knowledge not only affects the interests of individual nations but also builds their identities. The epistemic community refers to a composition of intellectuals who are regarded as the authority in a special field of knowledge, and this group of people can influence the policy-making process of the respective nations by forming a transnational consultative network. However, given the serious distrust among the major powers and the multilateral security structure, regional multilateral security cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region suffered a loss of structural leadership. As a standard model of the epistemic security community, track-two diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific region can be used as an instrument to initiate ideas and for policy consultation among regional actors. With the theory of epistemic community as a framework, and using the two case studies of ASEAN-ISIS and CSCAP, the author analyzes the role of track-two diplomacy in creating and spreading security norms, identity construction, and policy consultation in the process of Asia-Pacific multilateral security cooperation.

关 键 词：认知共同体 第二轨道外交 亚太地区 安全合作 

分 类 号：D83[政治法律—政治学]