工作场所工效学负荷综合暴露评估方法的建立及信度评价  

CQEC Development and Reliability Examination for Ergonomic Exposure Assessment at Workplace

作　　者：林嗣豪[1] 唐文娟[1] 王治明[2] 王绵珍[2] 

机构地区：[1]福建省职业病与化学中毒预防控制中心,福州350025 [2]四川大学华西公共卫生学院,成都610041

出　　处：《海峡预防医学杂志》2007年第5期3-6,共4页Strait Journal of Preventive Medicine

基　　金：福建省青年人才项目(编号:2006F3034)

摘　　要：[目的]建立一种新的工效学负荷评估方法，检验方法的信度。[方法]引进国外工效学快速暴露检查法（QEC），进行修订和补充；应用Kendall和谐系数W、Kappa值以及ICC对方法进行评估者间和评估者内（重测）的信度检验。[结果]新建的CQEC法简单实用，有9个观察条目和8个自评条目，评估身体5个部位。在不同评估者间，W值0．532～0．800，各部位负荷得分ICC值0．340-0．799，负荷等级分类的Kappa值0．528～0．819，表明CQEC评估者间的信度较好（P〈0．01）。对同一评估者，观察条目的Kappa值0．409～0．778，ICC值0．681～0．911，等级分类Kappa值0．549-0．645，说明CQEC在评估者内的一致性较好（P〈0．01）。[结论]新建立的CQEC方法具有一定的可靠性，适合我国职业人群应用。[Objective] To development a new method of ergonomic exposure assessment and examine its reliability. [Methods] Quick Exposure Check （QEC） was introduced and revised. Kendall＇s W, Kappa and inter-class correlation coefficient （ICC） were applied to examine the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability （test-retest）. [Results] Chinese Quick Ergonomic Check （CQEC） was simple and applicable, which include 9 observation items and 8 self-report items. CQEC could be used to assess 5 parts of body. Among different raters, Kendall＇s W, ICC and Kappa were 0. 532-0. 800, 0. 340- 0. 799 and 0. 528-0. 819 respectively. The results indicated that its inter-rater＇s reliability was high （P〈0.01）. Test-retest in the same rater showed good reliability of Kendall＇s W, ICC, and Kappa values with 0. 409-0. 778, 0. 681-0. 911, 0. 549-0. 645 respectively. [Conclusion] CQEC is reliable and can be applied to occupational health practice in China.

关 键 词：工效学负荷 暴露评估 信度 

分 类 号：R135[医药卫生—劳动卫生] R195.1[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]