两种业务流程建模方法的分析与比较  

Analysis and Comparison of Two Methods for Modeling Business Process

作　　者：付燕宁[1] 刘磊[1] 陈伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学计算机科学与技术学院,长春130012

出　　处：《吉林大学学报（理学版）》2007年第6期990-994,共5页Journal of Jilin University:Science Edition

基　　金：吉林省科技发展计划项目基金(批准号:20050527)

摘　　要：通过对同一业务流程两种不同实现版本的分析与比较,给出了业务流程定义语言(BPDL)在业务流程定义上的优缺点.分析结果表明,虽然采用BPDL开发活动流的效率不如传统方法,但BPDLs在活动流开发及修改上均优于传统方法,并且BPDL流程的执行效率随着BPDL执行机的成熟而提高.Two implemented versions for the same and the advantages and disadvantages in defining business process were analyzed and compared to each other, business processes with BPDLs were concluded. The result shows that although the efficiency of the activity flow developed by BPDLs is not better than that developed by a traditional method, BPDLs are more convenient to develop and modify the activity flow than traditional methods, and the efficiency of the BPDL process is improved as the BPDL execution engine gets more mature.

关 键 词：业务流程定义语言 业务流程 活动流 

分 类 号：TP311[自动化与计算机技术—计算机软件与理论]