检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林英华[1] 宋百敏[2] 韩茜[2] 王静[2] 张永[3] 于长青[2]
机构地区:[1]中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所国家林业局森林保护学重点实验室,北京100091 [2]清华大学生态保护研究中心 [3]北京市门头沟区科学技术委员会,北京门头沟区102300
出 处:《生态学报》2007年第11期4832-4839,共8页Acta Ecologica Sinica
基 金:北京市科学技术委员会资助项目~~
摘 要:以北京门头沟废弃矿区为例,研究弃矿生态恢复地表土壤动物群落多样性。2006年3月~4月,在设置的样带内,采用陷阱法对石灰矿天然恢复(下段)和人工恢复(上段)区的地表土壤动物群落进行调查。在157个陷阱中,共采集到地表土壤动物2604只(未知类群112只),隶属1门4纲16目1亚目47科。大型土壤动物优势类群有叶蝉科、蚁科,分别占大型土壤动物的22.45%和47.71%;中小型土壤动物优势类群有等节跳科、长角跳科和甲螨亚目,分别占中小型土壤动物的23.27%、35.22%和41.01%。矿区地表动物营养功能群以植食性和捕食性为主。Spearman等级相关分析表明,上、下段之间地表土壤动物个体数差别极显著(rs=0.446,p<0.01)。上段土壤动物个体数、类群丰富度和类群多样性随时间差异均显著(p<0.05);上、下段,部分土壤动物个体数、类群丰富度和类群多样性之间存在显著性差异(p<0.05)。非度量多维标度(Non-matricMultidimentionalScaling,No-metricMDS)分析表明,地表土壤动物个体数量、类群以及营养功能群的分布与恢复方式、土壤养分状况、地表植被状况有关。Mentougou District which is located in the West Mountains of Beijing, is the main quarrying area to satisfy the big demands of urban construction in Beijing. Quarrying has altered the landscape of Beijing West Mountains and resulted in the habitat degradation dramatically. Soil animals as the important part of the Earth's biological diversity play vital roles in decomposition, soil-plant ecosystem restoration, and even as indicators for ecological restorations. In order to study on the community diversity of ground dwelling soil animals in abandoned quarry areas, one transect with pitfall traps was set up in an abandoned quarry in Mentougou during March to April of 2006. The transect was across the quarry( down side)which was under natural restoration within 10 years and then up to the surrounding area (upper side) where was planted with Platycladus orientalis in the natural shrubwood. 2 604 individuals (112 unknown)of soil animals were collected from 157 pitfalls, which belonged to 4 classes, 16 orders and 1 suborders, and 47 families. Among the macro ground dwelling soil animals, the most common groups were cicadellidae (22.45%) and Formicidae (47.71%), then were common groups such as Tenebrionidae, Mycetophagidae, Scaphidiidae, Lathridiidae, Cicadidae, Thripidae, Armadillidiidae and Araneae. The most common meso and micro ground dwelling soil animals were Isotomidae (23.27%), Entomobryidae (35.22%), and Oribatida (41.01%). Phytophage was the most common guild (41.51%), then was predators (28.30%) and Omnivores ( 18.87% ). Fungivorous forms ( 1.89% ) and Cadavericoles ( 1.89% ) were the rarest guilds. The resuh by Spearman ranks correlation stated that the difference of individual numbers of ground dwelling soil animals between down side and upper side was very significant ( r, = 0. 446, p 〈 0.01 ). In the down side, the individual number and group richness were increasing from March 31 to April 21, and the group diversity and evenness were increasing
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3