检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海200092 [2]华东建筑设计研究院有限公司,上海200002 [3]华东电力设计院,上海200063
出 处:《岩土工程学报》2007年第11期1689-1695,共7页Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
基 金:上海市科委重点攻关项目(052112010)
摘 要:抗拔桩极限承载力的确定对于工程设计有决定性作用,由于实际工程情况和现场试验条件的限制,深层开挖条件下的抗拔桩极限承载力实际上无法通过现场试桩得到,因而理论研究显得尤为重要。采用基于直接约束算法的桩土库仑摩擦模型,借助于弹塑性有限单元法对上海某工程的等截面和扩底抗拔桩单桩足尺试验进行对比分析,验证了所采用的理论计算分析方法的合理性,得到了上海软土地区抗拔桩有限元计算的相关参数。然后在此基础上,对比了等截面和扩底抗拔桩受力特性,通过在不同开挖宽度和埋置深度条件下抗拔桩极限承载力的对比分析和影响因素的探讨,最后得到了深层开挖条件下抗拔桩承载力变化的一般规律。Determination of the ultimate uplift capacity for tension piles play a dominant role in engineering design. Unfortunately, due to the limitation of in-situ test conditions, it is almost impossible to obtain the ultimate uplift capacity of tension piles under deep excavation from field tests, and the theoretical study becomes the only feasible way to solve this problem. Adopting the Coulomb friction model for the pile-soil interface with direct constraints, two full-scale field tests on single uplift pile with uniform cross-section and enlarged head were simulated by employing the elastoplastic finite element method, and the simulated results were in good accordance with the field test data. Based on the above-mentioned analysis approach and calculation parameters, the difference between the uniform cross-section piles and the belled piles was examined and a comprehensive study focusing on the effects of excavation width and embedment depth was performed. Finally, suggestions for determining the ultimate uplift capacity of tension piles under deep excavation were given.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229