检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属儿科医院呼吸急救实验室,上海200032
出 处:《国际呼吸杂志》2007年第22期1736-1739,共4页International Journal of Respiration
摘 要:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(acute respiratory distress syndrome,ARDS)的临床特征是呼吸窘迫和严重的低氧血症,大部分的患者都需要机械通气。但是机械通气应用不当也会引起呼吸机相关性肺损伤,在某些情况下这种损伤甚至是致命的。在机械通气过程中应用呼气末气道正压(positive end—expiratory pressure,PEEP)可改善患者的低氧血症同时也可预防或减轻呼吸机相关性肺损伤。遗憾的是,尽管近40年来人们进行了大量的研究,但有关最佳PEEP压力水平的选择一直存在着争议。Acute respiratory distress syndrome is characterized clinically as respiratory distress and severe hypoxemiac. Almost all the patients require mechanical ventilation. But,inadequate use of ventilation can unexpectedly lead to ventilator-induced lung injury and in some conditions this injury may be deadly. Application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) could improve hypoxemia as well as prevent or reduce ventilator-induced lung injury. Unfortunately, although many clinical and experimental studies has been conducted in the past 4 decades,it remains controversial about setup of an adequate PEEP level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.226.47