检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑佩娜[1] 陈新庚[1] 李明光 周冬柏 吴军良[4]
机构地区:[1]中山大学环境科学与工程学院,广东广州510275 [2]广州市环境保护科学研究所,广东广州510620 [3]广州军区工程环境质量监督站,广东广州510507 [4]华南理工大学环境科学与工程学院,广东广州510640
出 处:《生态环境》2007年第5期1376-1381,共6页Ecology and Environmnet
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(20577011)
摘 要:排污收费制度是一项广泛应用的以减少污染物排放为主要目的的环境经济政策。国家新排污收费条例颁布4年后,需要对其实施效果进行评估。文章运用政策评估中的倾向线投射点与实际点比较法,对比分析了1996—2005年条例实施前后广东省的排污费和主要污染物排放量关系,探讨了排污收费制度对污染物减排的影响。结果表明,该条例的筹集资金功能强于旧收费制度,但对于污染物减排是乏力的,广东省主要污染物排放量不降反升,这与国家的减排要求不相适应。因此,应该对现行排污收费制度作进一步的改革。Effluent Charge Regulation (ECR) is a major environmental economic policy with the main purpose of reducing pollutants. It has been 4 years since the new national ECR put into force, and now it is necessary to evaluate the regulation's effect. The present paper use the Means Contract Tendency Shoot Point to Real Point Method, which is widely used in policy evaluation field, to evaluate the regulation's effect in Guangdong province from 1996 to 2005 and to discuss the relationship between the ECR and pollutants reduction. Results show that the new ECR had no apparent achievements in the pollutants gross control, although they had apparently stronger funds financing function than the older one. The pollutants' quantity emitted in Guangdong province increased rapidly after 2002, which would not meet the requirement from the central government. Therefore, the present ECR should be furthermore improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145