检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王洪才[1]
出 处:《复旦教育论坛》2007年第6期45-50,71,共7页Fudan Education Forum
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大立项课题"高等教育大众化与终身教育体系建构"成果;基金号为"05JJD880068"
摘 要:大学排行榜在我国出现具有重要的历史意义,它标志着社会参与高等教育评价的开始。目前大学排行榜仍面临着诸多方面质疑,集中地表现在其评价指标设计的科学性方面。本文从利益相关者角度出发,提出从"全覆盖、非冲突、非重合、可量化、典型性"五原则来提高评估指标体系的科学性。本文认为,大学排行榜发展状况能够折射出我国高等教育评估的未来走向。The appearance of various university rankings in China has its historical significance anti realistic meanings. It shows the beginning of social participation into higher education evaluation, which has satisfied the public accountability for higher education institutions. But such rankings have their deficiency too,which is mainly viewed as a lack of its public confidence. Based on the analysis of stake-holders, the author puts forward five principles to improve the evaluation indicator system, namely, "full coverage, free of conflicts,non-overlapping, being able to be measured and representativeness", and views that development of the university rankings must reflect the future direction of Chinese higher education evaluation.
分 类 号:G649.2[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.199