《行政强制法》(草案)执行模式之质疑——兼论我国行政强制执行体制重构之必要  被引量:3

The Necessity of Reshaping Chinese Administrative Enforcement Module

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王军[1] 

机构地区:[1]安徽省委党校法学部,安徽合肥230022

出  处:《云南大学学报(法学版)》2007年第6期94-99,共6页Jorunal of Yunan University Law Edition

基  金:中共安徽省委党校2006年校级资助课题

摘  要:司法主导型的行政强制执行模式,在目前的具体的而不是抽象的国情下,既不符合公正逻辑,也不符合强力诉求的最佳选择,更不能体现"无执行"的崇高境界追求,可能会造成司法和行政的两败俱伤,当改之。在价值定位方面,行政决定程序的价值在于公正与效率的并重,行政执行的价值当在于效率,司法审查的价值当在于公正。而不是不加区分的一概谈公正。我国在可预测的将来实行以下模式更为符合国情,以求"无执行"之效果:行政机关强制执行+行政、刑事处罚模式。Judicature - oriented module of administrative enforcement, under the current concrete instead of abstract conditions of our country, is neither logical nor the best alternative, thus failing to embody the enforcement of the concrete administrative action, which is the highest pursuit of a society. In consequence, it is necessary for it to be reformed to avoid the possible results of hurting both the judicature and the administration systems. The value orientation, the pursuit of administrative decision - making procedure, lies in its justice and efficiency. For the pursuit of enforcement of administrative decision, efficiency is the priority while for judicature, justice is the first concern. As a result, they are different from each other. The following module is suitable to the concrete conditions of our country, which is both predictable in the future and can be used to pursue the outcome of no enforcement of administrative decision: enforcement by administrative organs plus administrative and criminal sanction.

关 键 词:行政强制执行 模式 公正 强力 无执行 

分 类 号:DF3[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象