机构地区:[1]南方医科大学附属南方医院惠侨楼泌尿外科,广州510515
出 处:《中华医学杂志》2007年第42期3006-3011,共6页National Medical Journal of China
摘 要:目的了解糖尿病性勃起功能障碍大鼠阴茎海绵体平滑肌细胞α-肌动蛋白(actin)的表达及意义。方法利用链脲佐菌素(STZ)制作糖尿病及糖尿病性勃起功能障碍模型,40只 SPF 级SD 雄性大鼠,先按时间随机分为两组(每组20只),分别是注射 STZ 后7周组和4周组,再按处理因素即给予大鼠腹腔注射 STZ(60 mg/kg)是否成模,分为对照组(未注射 STZ,5只)、成糖尿病性勃起功能障碍模型组、成糖尿病性非勃起功能障碍组、未成模组。利用免疫组化 SP 染色法对不同处理组的标本进行α-肌动蛋白的研究,利用免疫组化 SABC 染色法对不同处理组的标本进行肌间线蛋白的研究,利用原位杂交技术检测不同组别骨桥蛋白(OPN)mRNA 含量的改变。图像分析利用彩色图文分析系统,第三人进行图像分析及数据采集,测量随机每高倍镜视野下累积光密度(IOD),以 IOD 的值反映组织切片中相应阳性物质的表达程度。结果糖尿病性勃起功能障碍组 IOD 均小于对照组、糖尿病非勃起功能障碍组及未成模组(均 P<0.05),糖尿病非勃起功能障碍组的 IOD 小于对照组和未成模组(P<0.05),不同时间点间的 IOD 不存在显著性差异(F=3.801,P=0.62),交互效应不显著(F=1.549,P=0.225)。免疫组化染色不同时间点间的 IOD 不存在显著性差异(F=0.052,P=0.821),各处理组间的 IOD 不存在显著性差异(F=0.045,P=0.987),交互效应不显著(F=0.572,P=0.639)。OPN mRNA 原位杂交染色不同时间点间的 IOD 不存在显著性差异(F=1.288,P=0.266),交互效应不显著(F=1.819,P=0.168),糖尿病性勃起功能障碍组的 IOD 均大于其余三组(P 均<0.001)。糖尿病非勃起功能障碍组的 IOD 大于对照组和未成模组(P 均<0.001)。对照组的 IOD 与未成模组未见显著差异(P=0.873)。结论糖尿病可以引起阴茎海绵体平滑肌的表型转化;阴茎海绵体平滑肌表型转化可以导致勃起功能障碍。Objective To investigate the phenotype modulation of smooth muscle of corpus cavernosum in diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction. Methods Thirty SD rats were randomly divided into 2 equal groups: 4-week group and 7-week group , injected with streptozocin to cause diabetes mellitus (DM), and then subdivided into DM group [ with DM and without erectile dysfunction. (ED)] , DM + ED group ( with DM and ED) , and group of failure to cause DM ( Group None) according whether DM was induced. Another 10 rats without STZ injection were divided into 4-week and 7-week control groups. The penis was resected and tmmunohistochemistry and color image analysis were used to observe the expression of α-actin and desmin in the corpus cavernosum. In situ hybridization was used to detect the mRNA expression of osteopontin ( OPN ), characteristic of noncontractil phenotype. Results The α-actin expression of smooth muscle in corpus cavernosum in the DM + ED group was significantly lower than those of the other groups (all P 〈 0.05 ). No significant difference existed between the 7 week group and 4 week group (F = 3. 801, P =0.62), and there was significant interaction ( F = 1. 549, P = 0. 225 ). There was no significant difference in the desmin expression of smooth muscle in corpus cavernosum among different groups ( F = 0. 045, P = 0. 987) and there was not significant interaction ( F = 0. 572 , P = 0. 639). The OPN mRNA expression of smooth muscle in corpus cavernosum of the DM + ED group was significantly higher than those of the other subgroups ( F = 156. 439, P = 0. 000). No significant difference existed between the 7 week group and 4 week group ( F = 1. 288, P =0. 266) , and there was no significant interaction ( F = 1. 819, P =0. 168 ). Conclusion Phenotype modulation of smooth muscle in corpus cavernosum can be caused by DM ED carl be caused by phenotype modulation of smooth muscle in corpus cavernosum.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...