从票据抗辩限制看票据无因性  

Discovering the Abstraction of Negotiable Instrument from the Limitation of Counterpleas in Negotiable Instrument

作　　者：郝慜[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国劳动关系学院法学系,北京100037

出　　处：《昆明大学学报》2007年第A01期33-36,共4页Journal of Kunming University

摘　　要：票据抗辩制度是对票据的安全性的保证，却对票据的更根本的作用一流通一产生限制。要找到两者的平衡点就需要对票据抗辩进行必要的限制，从而保证票据的流通。票据无因性也正是由这里体现出来的。票据抗辩限制不应该适用于直接当事人之间。票据抗辩限制的例外情况并不否认票据无因性，因为在那些情况下对安全性的要求超过了对流通性的要求。The institution of counterpleas in negotiable instrument is the guarantee of the security of using negotiable instnunent , but it limits the more important function of negotiable irculation. In order to find out the balance between these two issues and ensure the circulation of the negotiable instrument, it is necessary to limit counterpleas in negotiable instrument. However, the limitation of counterpleas in negotiable instrument should not be applied in the relations between the direct clients. In addition, the exceptions of the institution of the limitation of counterpleas in negotiable instrument do not deny the existence of the abstraction of negotiable instru ment, because under those cases the need of security has surpassed that of circulation.

关 键 词：票据抗辩 票据抗辩限制 票据无因性 

分 类 号：F810[经济管理—财政学]