检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长安大学汽车学院,陕西西安710064 [2]长安大学公路学院,陕西西安710064
出 处:《中国公路学报》2007年第6期117-121,共5页China Journal of Highway and Transport
基 金:交通部前期研究项目(2004-03)
摘 要:为评判农村公路资金渠道配置的相对合理性,在分析中国农村公路建设和养护资金渠道基础上,提出资金渠道配置评价的相对标度法。利用相对标度计算各资金渠道的重要度(权重),定义一个"标准"地区,确定标志值,估计反映各渠道配置相对合理性的匹配系数并求和,给出中国农村公路建设和养护资金主要渠道的权重参考值。实例计算结果表明:该方法简单、实用,且具有很强的灵活性,可用来优化农村公路资金渠道配置。With the intention of judging the relative rationality for fund source allocation of rural highway building and maintenance funds, analyzing various fund source of rural highway in China, authors offered relative scale methodology of fund source allocation assessment. Based on the methodology, authors computed weights of each of the fund sources; defined a standard area and determined criteria values; estimated the coefficient of suitability by each fund source allocation for giving expression to relative rationality, and finally summed up. Based on the methodology, weight values were given to each primary source of highway building and maintenance funds for reference, and an example was provided. Results show that the methodology which is simple, practical and agile may be used to prioritize fund sources allocation of rural highway.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15