检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学经济与管理学院 [2]同济大学经济与管理学院
出 处:《中国人口科学》2007年第6期51-60,共10页Chinese Journal of Population Science
基 金:国家社科基金(03BJY061);国家自然科学基金(70673065和70173016)资助
摘 要:文章以湖北、山西、云南3省调查资料为基础,结合持续数年田野调查和固定观察,综合分析了样本家庭对新粮食政策和新税收政策的反应。研究发现,取消农业税等新政策实施后,农户家庭种粮的积极性有所提高,但其种粮动机并没有根本的改变;农户家庭对税费负担轻重的感觉变化明显趋好;农户人均纯收入水平呈现一种持续上升趋势,但政策对收入增长的贡献以税收政策效应为主,补贴效应为辅。其直接贡献份额相当有限,政策变革的效应仅是"引子"效应。Based on survey data from Hubei,Shanxi and Yunan provinces,complemented by field work and fixed observation,this paper investigates the responses of rural households to the new policies of foodstuff subsidy and tax exemption.It finds that during the three years since the new policies were in effect,rural households ' enthusiasm of farming has slightly increased,and they feel an ease from the fee and tax burdens.However,the motivation of grain production doesn't have an essential enhancement.Per capita net income shows a continuously ascending trend.Comparing with subsidy policy,taxation policy has a main effect on income growth.In conclusion,the direct effect of the new policy is relatively limited,and it actually acts as an activator to the rural economy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222