检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]云南大学人文学院历史系,昆明650231 [2]中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京100044
出 处:《人类学学报》2007年第4期305-310,共6页Acta Anthropologica Sinica
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(2006CB806400)
摘 要:本文从应用目的的角度出发,对虎头梁遗址中的细石器技术进行了界定。通过数量统计、模拟计算等方法论证了虎头梁遗址中共存在着2种细石器技术,它们分别以Ⅰ型细石核和Ⅱ型细石核为代表。这两种细石器技术体现出了不同的剥片效率以及古人类在对外部环境适应方面的不同需求。Ⅰ型细石核因其相对较高的剥片效率以及构思巧妙的外部形态、加工精细的刃缘具有石核和工具的双重功能,常被古人外出时携带使用。Ⅱ型细石核则是古人类仅用来在固定地点剥制细石叶而使用的。In the paper microlithic technology is defined on the basis of studying microlithic materials from the Hutouliang site. By means of statistical analysis and model, the author considers that there are two microlithic technologies existed in the Hutouliang site: wedge-shaped core Ⅰ and Ⅱ. In comparison, the microblade detaching efficiency of Type Ⅰ cores are higher than the Type Ⅱ cores. Type Ⅰ cores have been recognized as a multi-functional artifacts that could have been used as tools such as scraper, point, drill, as well as microcore to produce microblades. Moreover, they could also have been carried along by prehistoric hunter-gatherers as part of provisioned toolkits, whereas Type Ⅱ cores only have been used as cores to detach microblades in living areas.
分 类 号:K871.1[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222