197例民事行为能力的司法精神病学鉴定分析  

Analysis of psychiatric expert testimony for civil capability in 197 cases

作　　者：曹威[1] 魏海燕[1] 刘仲伟[1] 刘小林[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属精神病院,武汉430022

出　　处：《临床精神医学杂志》2007年第6期418-419,共2页Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

摘　　要：目的:探讨司法鉴定中关于民事行为能力评定特点。方法:收集2001年至2005年197例民事行为能力评定的司法鉴定资料,对鉴定中案件类型、诊断及结论进行分析。结果:民事行为能力的司法鉴定中案件类型排在前3位的依次为离婚(47.7%),签定契约能力(14.7%),劳动争议(10.7%);排在前3位的诊断是精神分裂症(48.7%),器质性精神障碍(14.7%)和情感性精神障碍(10.7%)。民事行为能力评定以无最为常见,占76.6%,其次为限制行为能力。结论:民事行为能力评定以三分法为主,某些具体操作中以两分法为宜。评定结论受到诊断及具体事件的影响。Objective： To investigate the characteristics of evaluation of civil capability in judicial expertise. Method： 197 eases of evaluation of civil capability from 2001 to 2005 were collected as data of judicial expertise. The ease type, diagnosis and conclusion were analyzed. Results：With respect to ease type of civil capability in judicial expertise, the first type was divorce （47.7 % ）, then contract capability judge （ 14.7 % ） and labor dispute （ 10.7 % ）. And the most common diagnosis was schizophrenia （48.7%）, mental disorders due to brain disease （14.7%） and mood disorder （10.7%）. The most common conclusion of evaluation of civil capability was completed responsibility （76.6%）, secondly, reduced responsibility. Conclusion： The evaluation of civil capability is usually based on trichotomy and material practice was aptly based on dichotomy. The conclusion of evaluation is influenced by diagnosis and special events.

关 键 词：民事行为能力 精神障碍 司法鉴定 

分 类 号：D919.3[医药卫生—法医学]