检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王瑞生[1]
机构地区:[1]国土资源部
出 处:《中国国土资源经济》2007年第11期4-7,46,共4页Natural Resource Economics of China
摘 要:秘鲁和巴西都是世界上矿产资源较为富集的国家和南美洲的矿产资源大国,两国的矿产资源和能源资源均实行大部门统一管理,矿业权管理制度较为健全,监管较为严格,并且重视发挥资源税费政策的调节作用,重视矿山环境的保护与治理。我国应借鉴秘鲁和巴西的经验,继续施行矿产资源与能源资源的统一管理,进一步重视矿山环境的生态保护工作,简化我国现行的矿业税费结构,调整探矿权、采矿权使用费标准,改革增值税计征方式,降低矿山企业增值税的税赋水平。The paper introduces some experiences concerning mineral resource administration of Peru and Brazil,such as perfect mining rights management system,strict mechanism for oversight and management,as well as paying more attention to both giving full play to the regulation of resource taxes and administrative charges policies,and protection and control of mining environment.It goes on to point out that we should take the experiences of Peru and Brazil for reference,and continually carry out single management of mineral resources and energy resources,make further efforts on preserving the ecological environment of mining,simplify the structure of current mining taxes and administration charges,re-adjust the standard of utilization fees for mineral prospecting rights and exploitation rights;reduce the amount of value added tax to be paid by mining enterprises.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28