检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东莱芜钢铁集团有限公司医院,莱芜市271125 [2]山东莱芜市人民医院,莱芜市271100
出 处:《中国药房》2007年第35期2728-2730,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:评价替米沙坦不同联用药方案治疗轻、中度原发性高血压的成本-效果。方法:60例患者随机分为3组,分别给予替米沙坦+非洛地平(A组)、替米沙坦+依那普利(B组)、替米沙坦+吲达帕胺(C组)治疗8wk后进行成本-效果分析。结果:A、B、C组总有效率分别为90%、85%、95%;总成本分别为422.80、409.50、348.88元,C组与A、B组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:C组方案治疗轻、中度原发性高血压较佳。OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the cost- effectiveness of telmisartan in combination with different drugs in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.METHODS:A total of 60 patients were enrolled and randomized to Group A (telmisartan + felodipine), Group B(telmisartan + enalapril), or Group C(telmisartan + indapamide) .A cost - effectiveness analysis of the three therapeutic schemes was conducted after 8- wk treatment.RESULTS: The effective rates of three Groups were 90%, 85 % and 95 %, respectively; the total costs of three groups were 422.80,409.50 and 348.88 yuan, respectively, with Group C showing significant difference as compared with the other two groups(Group B and Group C)(P 〈 0.05) .CONCLUSION:Group C(telmisartan + indapamide) was the optimal therapeutic schemes for mild to moderate essential hypertension.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185