检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宇万太[1] 姜子绍[1] 李新宇[1] 丁怀香[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳110016
出 处:《应用生态学报》2007年第12期2760-2764,共5页Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基 金:国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD05B05);中国科学院知识创新工程项目(KZCX2-YW-407);中国科学院野外台站基金资助项目
摘 要:对潮棕壤不同土地利用方式下0~100cm土体中土壤有机碳含量的剖面分布、有机碳储量及C/N进行了研究.结果表明:不同土地利用方式下土壤有机碳含量的剖面分布差异明显,林地、割草地、荒地及裸地各土层有机碳含量高于农田生态系统;不同土地利用方式下的土壤有机碳与全氮呈极显著的正相关;土壤C/N随剖面土层深度的增加呈下降趋势,林地土壤的C/N相对较高:割草地、荒地和裸地次之,农田生态系统的土壤C/N较低.在0~100cm深度土壤,荒地每年截获的土壤有机碳分别比农田不施肥、农田循环猪圈肥处理、农田化肥NPK处理、农田化肥NPK+循环猪圈肥处理高4.52、4.25、4.46和3.58t·hm^-2.说明荒地在增加土壤有机碳储量方面有很大潜力.The profile distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC), its storage, and carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio at the depth of 0-100 cm under different land use types were investigated in this paper. The results showed that the profile distribution of SOC varied significantly with land use type. The SOC contents in each soil layer in forestland, mowing land and wasteland were all higher than that in agricultural land. In all land use types, SOC was significantly correlated with soil total N. Soil C/N ratio generally decreased with depth, which was higher in forestland than in mowing land, wasteland and bare land, and was the lowest in agricultural land. At the depth of 0-100 cm, the annual sequestration of SOC in wasteland was 4. 52, 4. 25, 4. 46 and 3.58 t · hm^-2 more than that in farmland with no fertilization, farmland with recycled manure application, farmland with N, P and K fertilization, and farmland with the application of both recycled manure and N, P and K, respectively, suggesting that wasteland had a great potential in increasing SOC storage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222