试析交叉学科研究的真实性评价  

Analysis of Authentic Assessment of Interdisciplinary Research

作　　者：马跃[1] 蔡兵[2] 雷斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南交通大学科学技术处,四川成都610031 [2]四川大学科技处,四川成都610064

出　　处：《西南交通大学学报（社会科学版）》2007年第6期21-25,31,共6页Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：四川省软科学研究项目(2006R16-039)

摘　　要：交叉学科研究真实性评价是检验交叉学科研究项目进展成效的一种评价方式,它要求研究者(组)运用所掌握的交叉学科知识和技能去再现研究成果的获取过程或模拟真实环境下研发装置的实际运行。真实性评价方式有自我评价、组内互评、文档评定、表现评定和项目规划评定等。真实性评价中的评分测度规则的构成要素包含评分准则、质量等级、评分策略和具体示例。在交叉学科研究中其评价主体应注意分析范例样本、确定评分准则、选择评分策略、描述质量等级、草拟评分测度规则和在试用中修订评分测度规则,以使研究者对自己正在研究的任务和设计方案的进展能正确评价,并由此改善其研究状况以提高研究成果的质量。Authentic assessment of interdisciplinary research is a method of assessing the development of interdisciplinary research project. It requires researchers to use interdisciplinary knowledge and skills to demonstrate the process of how research fruits are achieved or to simulate the actual operation of research equipments in the authentic atmosphere. Authentic assessment can be conducted through such methods as self-evaluation, intra-group evaluation, file evaluation, performance evaluation and project planning evaluation. Its graded measurement rules include standard of grading, quality scales, evaluating strategies and specific demonstration. The assessors should analyze the model samples, determine the standard of grading, select evaluating strategies, describe quality scales, draft graded measurement rules and revise some of the rules. Authentic assessment enables researchers to evaluate the development of the tasks they are solving and the plans they are designing so that the quality of research can be improved.

关 键 词：交叉学科研究 真实性评价 评分测度规则 

分 类 号：G301[文化科学]