检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京航空航天大学法律系,江苏南京210016
出 处:《南京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》2007年第4期52-56,75,共6页Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics(Social Sciences)
基 金:江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目(04SJD820012)
摘 要:新中国成立以来,城市房屋拆迁制度历经变迁,其价值取向经历了从"公平优先"到"效率优先"再到"效率优先,兼顾公平"的变化,这对满足特定历史时期的客观需要起到了一定的作用,但在倡导法治,弘扬民权的现代社会,这些价值取向所带来的弊端已不断显露出来。我国现代城市房屋拆迁应当具有"公平优先,兼顾效率"、"民权优先"、"民生为本"、"克减公权"等法律价值取向和理念,惟此才能对我国城市房屋拆迁立法、行政执法、司法救济等起到前瞻性的指导作用,对依法推进城市化进程和切实维护公民的合法的人身和财产权益发挥应有的价值。The civic building relocation system has been changed values transformed from justice priority to efficiency priority and then to efficiency priority with justice. This transformation did help to satisfy the historic objective specific to a time, but its weaknesses have emerged nowadays since today it is more important to insist on rule by law and civil rights. Today our civic building relocation system should contain the value selection and thoughts of justice priority with efficiency, civil rights priority, civil life basis, public rights restriction and so on. Only in this way can a forecasting impact be exerted on the direction of civic building relocation legislation, administrative execution of law, judicature remedy, etc. Also it will have an integrant effect on promoting urbanization process by law and protecting the body and property rights of people.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117