检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学环境科学与工程学院,武汉430074
出 处:《环境保护科学》2007年第6期21-23,共3页Environmental Protection Science
基 金:国家高技术研究发展计划资助项目(2002AA601021)
摘 要:针对武汉市莲花湖湖水,采用聚合氯化铝(PAC)和聚磷硫酸铁(PPFS)进行絮凝实验,比较了两种无机絮凝剂的絮凝效果及原水处理前后藻类群落变化。主要结论如下:①PPFS与PAC的最佳投加量分别为1.5mg/L、2.0mg/L;②PPFS在去除藻类细胞、浊度和色度方面均优于PAC,当PPFS投加过量时,因水体中Fe3+过量分布,使水样色度去除率下降;③PPFS絮凝处理微囊藻为主体的水华原水时,其效果比PAC更好。本文研究后表明:PPFS是一种新型高效絮凝剂,其絮凝性能明显优于PAC,当水体以微型藻类为主时,可使用PPFS以替代PAC,能提高絮凝效果。With the water samples from Lianhua Lake, beaker test was carried out to compare the coagulation efficiency of the two inorganic coagulants, Polymeric Aluminum Chloride(PAC)and Polymeric Phosphate Ferric Sulfate( PPFS), and the change of the algae conununity in the raw water before and after the treatment was compared. The main conclusions are as follows: ①The best capacity of PPFS and PAC is 1.5ml,2. 0ml respectively; ②PPFS is superior to PAC in removing algae cell, turbidity and colority, while added PFFS excessively, the colority removal ratio reduces because of redundant Fe^3+ in water;③PPFS is better than PAC in removing micro-algae( Microcystis Kutz. )from the raw water. According to experiment results, this paper shows that PPFS is a new effective coagulant, and its coagulation effect is better than PAC evidently; while micro-algae dominate in water, it can make improvement in algae removal operation by use PPFS instead of PAC.
分 类 号:X788[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15