检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙静[1] 董海龙[1] 栾琪[1] 赵翚[1] 路志红[1] 熊利泽[1]
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学西京医院麻醉科,陕西西安710033
出 处:《第四军医大学学报》2007年第24期2214-2216,共3页Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University
基 金:国家自然科学基金(30471664)
摘 要:目的:探寻缺血后处理(IP)对大鼠局灶性脑缺血损伤保护作用的最佳时间,比较该处理方案与缺血预处理(IPC)脑保护效应.方法:IP最佳时间确定实验分组:60只雄性SD大鼠,随机分为6组(n=10).对照组,行单纯缺血再灌注;IP-15s,30s,1min,2min和5min不同时间点组,分别于大脑中动脉线栓阻闭(MCAO)90min后,再灌注15s,30s,1min,2min和5min,缺血15s,30s,1min,2min和5min,反复三次,组间比较得出IP最佳时间.比较IP最佳时间与IPC脑保护效应实验分组:30只雄性SD大鼠,随机分为3组(n=10).对照组,IP-15s组和IPC组,预先阻闭大脑中动脉20min,再灌注24h后行MCAO90min.上述实验90只动物经再灌注24h后进行神经功能障碍评分.取大脑行2,3,5-氯化三苯四唑(TTC)染色确定脑梗死容积百分比,并行统计学分析.结果:再灌注24h后,在IP最佳时间的确定实验中,IP-15s组神经功能评分和脑梗死容积(34.0±4.8)%明显低于对照组[(58.9±12.2)%,P<0.01];在IP与IPC脑保护效应比较实验中,IP-15s和IPC的神经功能评分与对照组相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),但IP-15s脑梗死容积(36.1±10.3)%大于IPC组[(26.8±3.3)%,P<0.01].结论:IP对大鼠局灶性脑缺血损伤保护作用的最佳时间为15s再灌注/缺血,反复三次;IP的脑保护效应弱于IPC.AIM: To investigate the optimal protocol of ischemic postconditioning (IP) against focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury, and compare the effect of IP with that of ischemic precon- ditioning ( IP, C). METHODS : To confirm the optimal protocol of IP, 60 male SD rats weighing 290-310 g were randomly assigned to 6 groups (n = 10 each): control group and IP groups with different time intervals (15, 30 s, 1,2 and 5 rain). IP was performed by three cycles of reperfusion/ischemia (R/I) at different time intervals ( 15, 30 s, 1,2 and 5 min respectively) after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) for 90 rain. To compare the effect of IP with that of IPC, 30 male SD rats weighing 290- 310 g were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 10 each) : control group, IP-15s and IPC. The rats in IP group were subjected to 3 cycles of R/I after 90 rain MCAO at the best time interval(15 s). The rats in IPC group were subjected to 20 min MCAO 24 h before 90 rain MCAO. The neurological deficit scores (NDS) were evaluated 24 h after reperfusion, and the 90 animals were sacrificed. Infarct volume, as a percentage of volume at normal cerebral hemisphere, was determined by 2, 3, 5-triPhenyltetrazolium (TTC) staining. RESULTS: NDS was significantly lower and the infarct volume was significantly smaller in IP-15 s group [ (34.0 ± 4.8)% ]compared to that of control group[ (58.9 ±12.2)%, P 〈0.01] 24 h after the reperfusion. The NDS in IP-15 s group and IPC group were better than that in control group. The infarct volume in IP-15 s group [ (36. 1± 10.3)% ] was larger than that in IPC group [ (26.8 ± 3.3) %, P 〈 0.01 ]. CONCLUSION : The optimal protocol of IP to induce ischemic tolerance in brain is three cycles of R/I (15 s/15 s). And the neuroprotection induced by IPC is stronger than that by IP.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.194.2