检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:倪洪涛[1]
出 处:《甘肃政法学院学报》2007年第6期74-78,共5页Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
基 金:2006年湖南省教育科学"十一五"规划项目<大学生申诉制度研究>(项目批准号:XJK06CGD003)阶段性成果。
摘 要:学术自由精神和大学自治理念决定了司法审查对大学治理的介入必定是有限度的。但是,即便是这样有限度的介入,在我国法治实践中也遭致了现实的困境与尴尬,从而使大学生合法权益得不到有效的救济与保障,大学成为法治的真空地带。究其原因,以下几个方面的体制性障碍值得关注和探讨:大学"自治规章"审查机制的缺失;"内部行政行为"理论的思想禁锢;我国行政主体理论的现实困境;教育行政规章的压挤效应。The sprit of academic freedom and the idea of university autonomy decide judicial review of university governance intervention must be limited. However, even this limited degree of intervention , it also Encountered dilemma and embarrassing in the rule of law practice, which make students legitimate rights and interests have not been effectively relief and security , University becomes a vacuum in the rule of law. Researching reasons, the following areas of institutional obstacles must be concerned and explored, the " self-regulation" of university lack of review mechanism, the thinking detention of "Internal administrative action" theory, the real dilemma of our administrative body theory and the squeezing effect of the education administrative regulatory.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.0.146