检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄丽萍[1]
机构地区:[1]广东外语外贸大学法学院,广东广州510420
出 处:《国际经贸探索》2007年第12期37-40,共4页International Economics and Trade Research
摘 要:随着我国对外贸易的不断发展,建立和完善我国的反规避法律体系具有重大的现实意义,而我国现行法律对反倾销规避仅作原则性规定,不利于实践中操作。文章通过对美国、欧盟的反规避立法和GATT乌拉圭回合中"邓克尔草案"的反规避条款的比较分析,提出我国应重视吸收这些发达国家和地区的立法经验,并从法律体例、实体内容以及程序上对我国反规避条款全面加以完善。On March 13, 2004, Anti-dumping Rule (461/2004) issued by EU Ministry Council revised the anti-circumvent clause greatly. With the development of China's foreign trade, it is very important to establish and optimize our legal system of anti-circumvent. In China, the current legislation on anti-circumvent is only at an early stage, so it is difficult to implement them effectively. By a comparative analysis between the anti-circumvent legislations of the U.S.A and EU and that of "Dunkel Draft" in GATF Uruguay Round, the author points out that we should use the experience of anti-circumvent legislations in advanced countries and areas for reference, in order to improve our anti-circumvent legislations in terms of legal style, substance content and procedure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229