检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学 资源环境学院,陕西杨凌712100 [2]水利部 黄河水利委员会中游水文水资源局,山西晋中030600
出 处:《水土保持通报》2007年第6期90-94,共5页Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
基 金:中国科学院"西部之光"人才培养计划(2005XB01);欧盟项目(DESIRE;037046)
摘 要:水土保持措施是减少河流泥沙的主要措施。水土保持措施在减少土壤侵蚀的同时也会减少地表径流和地表水资源量。根据目前我国北方地区水土保持对径流量和泥沙量的研究结果,比较分析了在坡面和沟道上梯田、造林、种草和坝地等水土保持措施减沙水代价,并对不同流域尺度水土保持综合措施减沙水代价进行了综合分析。研究表明,同一区域不同水土保持各单项措施减沙水代价不同;同一措施和综合措施减沙水代价存在明显的区域分异,通过选择减沙水代价较小的水土保持措施的类型和区域配置,可以在减少相同泥沙量的同时,相对增加河流水资源量。Soil conservation can greatly influence runoff by reducing sediment into river. Runoff cost for sediment control, shown as RRS (ratio of runoff retained to sediment retained) of different soil and water conservation measures is an important integrated indicator to evaluate the impact on runoff and sediment synchronously. Based on the reported research results on the effects of soil and water conservation on runoff and sediment in North China, runoff cost for sediment control with different measures and integrated measures at different basin scales is analyzed. The regional differences of runoff cost for sediment control by integrated and individual measures are distinct. If soil and water conservation measures with a smaller RRS are adopted, more runoff can be saved in reducing the same amount of sediment and water resource conditions can be improved in the arid and semi-arid areas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15