检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王大为[1] 冯志才[1] 朱双林[1] 卢新华[1] 张弘[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学光华口腔医学院正畸科,广州510055
出 处:《中华口腔医学杂志》2008年第1期16-20,共5页Chinese Journal of Stomatology
摘 要:目的应用自攻型种植体支抗治疗成年上牙弓前突,评价种植体支抗的疗效。方法选取严重上牙弓前突成年患者8例,其中男性3例,女性5例,年龄18~31岁。在上颌第二前磨牙与第一磨牙间植入种植体,以两步法内收上前牙,通过X线头影测量方法观察种植体、磨牙、尖牙及切牙在矢状和垂直方向上的位置变化;配对t检验比较治疗前后的差异。结果治疗后种植体头部、体部及尾部的矢状向位移分别为(0.42±0.50)mm、(0.18±0.35)mm、(-0.15±0.47)mm,垂直向位移分别(0.12±0.21)mm、(0.24±0.36)mm、(0.26±0.48)mm;上颌第一磨牙矢状向位移为(0.70±2.45)mm,轴倾度增大(2.06±1.70)。治疗前后比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。治疗后上颌切牙切端平均水平内收6.86mm,切牙牙轴平均减少18.03°,切牙阻抗中心平均压入3.28mm,尖牙平均远移6.83mm,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论种植体支抗可实现理想的支抗控制效果。Objective To investigate the position change of upper molars and incisors in order to evaluate the stability of posterior anchorage with the application of micro-screw implant. Methods Eight adult patients with severe maxillary protrusion were included. Upper first premolars were extracted and upper posterior anchorage was reinforced with micro-screw implant in all patients. Cephalometric and cast analyses were carried out to record the position change of molar and micro-screw. Results During treatment the micro-screw implants kept stable in sagittal and vertical plane. Neither the mesial-distal movement nor the tipping of the upper molars during the treatment was statistically significant ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The edge of upper incisors was retracted by 6. 86 mm and the tipping was reduced by 18. 03°. The center of resistance was intruded by 3.28 mm on average. Significant change was observed ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusions Micro-screw implant could provide good anchorage control in the orthodontic treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117