检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李广军[1] 王青[1] 顾晓薇[1] 刘建兴[1]
机构地区:[1]东北大学资源与土木工程学院,辽宁沈阳110004
出 处:《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》2008年第1期121-124,共4页Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基 金:教育部优秀中青年教师基金资助项目(1711);中国香港特别行政区嘉道理农场暨植物园资助项目
摘 要:近年来关于深圳和苏州发展的对比大多是从经济、生活水平方面进行的.但经济发展对城市生态环境的影响的比较却很少出现,基于此,利用国际上比较流行的生态足迹分析法对两个城市1997~2004年的可持续发展进行对比研究,以了解两市在发展过程中对生态环境的影响程度.研究结果表明深圳市和苏州市在发展过程中对生态环境都造成了很大的影响,以2004年为例,支持深圳市和苏州市的发展需要大约28倍的深圳市面积和12倍的苏州市面积.能源消费是影响两市生态足迹大小的最主要因素,这主要是因为苏州市的主要产业以第二产业为主,而深圳市以第二产业和第三产业为主.Recently, the comparative study on the development of China's Shenzhen and Suzhou cities was mainly based on their economy and people's living standard. However, the impact of economic development on their ecological environment was often overlooked. The principle and mathematical model of the ecological footprint were therefore introduced into the case studies of Shenzhen and Suzhou from 1997 to 2004, and the results showed that the development of the two cities has great impact on the ecological environment. Taking the year 2004 as example, the consumption of different resources in Shenzhen needed about 28 times its area to sustain the demand for the population in the city, and in Suzhou it was about 12 times its area. Energy consumption predominated in the cities, since the secondary industry is dominant in Suzhou and the secondary industry and tertiary industry are dominant in Shenzhen.
分 类 号:F061.3[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7