检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:单英[1] 刘欣[1] 熊诗松[1] 巴秋菊[1] 赵敏[1] 周灵杰[1]
机构地区:[1]河南省医学科学研究所
出 处:《新药与临床》1997年第5期277-279,共3页
摘 要:目的:比较人白细胞干扰素(LIFN)和基因工程干扰素α-1b(rIFNα-1b)治疗慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)的疗效和不良反应。方法:CHB病人83例(男性69例,女性14例;年龄32±s8a)。A组29例,用LIFN3MU;B组27例,用rIFNα-1b3MU,C组27例用人血浆白蛋白冻干制品10g,3组均im,qd×4wk,继以qod×8wk。结果:3组HBeAg阴转率分别为38%,41%,7%;HBV-DNA阴转率分别为40%,52%,7%。A和B组IFN对HBV复制的抑制作用显著优于C组(P<0.05),但A和B组间无显著差异。A组不良反应显著大于B组(P<0.05)。结论:2种不同来源的IFN治疗CHB均有显著疗效,2药无显著差别,但A组不良反应明显。AIM: To compare the efficacies and adverse reactions between human leukocyte interferon (LIFN) and recombinant interferon α-1b (rIFN α-1b ) in treatment of chronic hepatities B (CHB). METHODS: Patients (n=83, M 69, F 14; age 32±s 8 a) with biopsy-proven CHB were randomly allocated into 3 groups; (A) 29 patients were treated with LIFN 3 MU; (B) 27 patients with rIFN α-1b 3 MU; (C) 27 patients served as control with human albumin 10 g, im qd×4 wk, followed by qod×8 wk. RESULTS: The seroconversion rates of HBeAg and HBV-DNA for 3 groups were 38%, 41%, 7% and 40%, 52%, 7%, respectively. There was difference between treated and untreated groups of IFN (P<0.05), but no significant different was found between group A and group B. The adverse reactions were more obvious in group A than those in group B (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: LIFN and rIFN α-1b have therapeutic effects on CHB. LIFN does not get better than rIFN α-1b with respect of the efficacy in therapy of CHB based on the same dose. But the adverse reactions are more obvious in LIFN recipients than in rIFN α-1b recipients.
分 类 号:R512.620.5[医药卫生—内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3