胺碘酮与心律平应用于房颤转复与维持窦律96例对比分析  被引量:5

Efficacy comparision of intravenous amiodarone and propafenon for atriarl fibrillation

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:赵京文[1] 高晖[1] 

机构地区:[1]西安市第四医院心内科,西安710004

出  处:《陕西医学杂志》2008年第1期80-82,共3页Shaanxi Medical Journal

摘  要:目的:观察应用胺碘酮与心律平对阵发性快速心房颤动(房颤)的治疗效果。方法:选择96例患者按就诊顺序随机分为两组,A组(49例):胺碘酮150mg+生理盐水10ml静脉注射,10min注射完毕;B组(47例):心律平70mg+生理盐水10ml静脉注射,5~10min注射完毕。观察10~20min若未转复可重复应用,最大累积量胺碘酮为450mg,心律平为210mg。A组复律成功者继续服用胺碘酮0.2g,每天1次维持。B组复律成功者继续接受心律平治疗,150mg,每8小时1次维持,结果:转复率:胺碘酮组75.51%(37/49),心律平组48.94%(23/47),两组转复率比较有显著性差异(χ2=6.14,P<0.05)。复律后维持窦律的疗效:胺碘酮组的维持率均明显高于心律平组,且两组相比均有显著性差异。随访1,3,6,12月胺碘酮组左心房直径缩小,左心室舒张早期经二尖瓣血流的最高值(E峰值)和左心房收缩时经二尖瓣血流的最大值(A峰值)、E/A增大。1,3,6,12月间比较极有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:胺碘酮和心律平对阵发性快速房颤均有较高的转复率,胺碘酮复律后窦律维持率高于心律平,胺碘酮对逆转心房心肌重构安全有效。Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous amiodarone and propafenon for atriarl fibrillation(AF). Methods: 96 patients were divided into two groups randomly. Group A (49 patients) was treated intravenously with 150 mg amiodarone and 10ml normal saline within 10min. Group B(47 patients) was treated intravenously with 70mg propafenon and 10ml normal saline within 5 - 10 min. After 10- 20 min, when the resuscitation was not good, the above intravenous injections were given again, the maximum accumulated dose was 450mg(AM) and 210mg (propafenon), The patients resuscitated in group A were given amiodarone 0. 2g per day, People resuscitated in group B were given propafenon 150 mg every 8 hours. Results: The resuscitation rate of 2 groups was 75. 51% (37 /49) and 48.94% (23/47) respectively(9(χ^2=6. 14, P〈0.05). At 12 month after treatment period, there was a significant higher sinus rhythm ratio in amiodarone than in propafenone group (P〈0. 01). There were a smaller left atrial diameter, a higher peak value of blood flow via mitral valve at early left ventricular diastole period (E value) , a higher peak value of blood flow via mitral valve at left atrial diastole period (A value) and a higher E/A ratio at 1,3, 6 and 12 month after treatment period than before treatment in amiodarone group ,with a significant difference between any two different timepoints (P〈 0. 01). Conclusions: Both amiodarone and propafenon have high efficacy for treatment of AF, but amiodarone is better in reversion of atrial remodeling.

关 键 词:心房颤动/药物疗法 胺碘酮/治疗应用 钠通道阻滞剂/治疗应用 对比研究 

分 类 号:R541.705[医药卫生—心血管疾病] R541.75[医药卫生—内科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象