检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张怡[1]
出 处:《证券市场导报》2008年第1期12-18,共7页Securities Market Herald
摘 要:本文使用DEA模型,对中国39家证券公司2003-2006年自营业务绩效和证券行业分类监管规则有效性进行了实证研究。结果显示,弱市中创新类券商的自营绩效不如规范类券商,原因在于市场投资机会缺乏和券商应变能力不足,同时创新类券商在过度等资上存在失误。常规监管阶段证券公司分类监管规则的有效性比综合治理阶段大大提高,但仍需从弱化净资本指标、强化盈利性指标两方面进行改进。鉴于过度筹资是券商的普遍问题,监管者应根据市场状况调整监管措施,弱市中限制各类券商的负债规模。The paper used DEA model to research the business performance of China 39 securities companies' proprietary trading and the validity of classification supervision roles. The empirical results show that innovative companies perform poorer than the normative companies in bear market, probably due to lacking of investment opportunities and inadequacy of their resilience. The excessive fmancing of the innovative securities companies is inappropriate as well. In conventional monitoring stage, the validity of rules of classification regulation enhanced over that in comprehensive management stage. But the roles still require improvement in two aspects: weakening net capital indicators and strengthening profitability indicators. Given that the excessive financing is a common problem of securities firms, the regulator should adjust regulatory measures according to market conditions, to restrict the size of the liabilities of various brokerage firms in bear market.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28