检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶虎春[1,2] 倪晋仁[1,2] 易丹[1] 曾立武[1] 林立[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学深圳研究生院,城市人居环境科学与技术重点实验室,广东深圳518055 [2]北京大学环境工程系,水沙科学教育部重点实验室,北京100871
出 处:《应用基础与工程科学学报》2008年第1期23-28,共6页Journal of Basic Science and Engineering
基 金:国家“十一五”科技支撑课题(2006BAB04A14)资助
摘 要:通过微生物燃料电池(microbial fuel cell,MFC)与传统厌氧消化(conventional anaerobic digestion,CAD)的比较试验,考察了对高浓度葡萄糖和硫酸盐人工废水的处理效果.MFC在获得一定能量的同时(I=0.16mA,P=4.76mW/m^2),有效去除水中有机物,去除率高于CAD.葡萄糖为碳源,初始TOC=2100mg/L,运行144h,MFC获得91.61%去除率,CAD获得58.85%去除率;初始NH_3-N为500mg/L,MFC中去除率最高达92.61%,CAD达72.38%;MFC中对硫酸盐的利用率和CH_4产生量都低于CAD;比较结果表明,MFC技术可提高处理高浓度有机废水的效果.Tests were conducted to compare the effect of a microbial fuel cell (MFC) reactor and a conventional anaerobic (CAD) digester on artificial wastewater with heavy concentration of glucose and sulfate. Energy was obtained in MFC ( I = 0. 16mA, P = 4. 76 mW/m^2 ) , organic matter was cut down from wastewater simultaneously. Removal rate of organic matter in MFC was higher than CAD. Glucose as carbon source, TOC = 2100mg/L originally, run time 144h, removal rateof 91.61% in MFC was obtained, 58.85% in CAD correspondingly. Original NH3-N=500mg/L,maximum removal rate of 92. 61% in MFC was obtained,72.38% in CAD correspondingly. Conversion ratio of sulfate and production of CH4 in MFC was lower than CAD. A conclusion was drawn by comparison that MFC technology can improve efficiency on heavy organic wastewater treatment.
分 类 号:X703.1[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40