检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院附属第二医院心内科,浙江杭州310009 [2]杭州市第七医院精神科,浙江杭州310013
出 处:《中国病理生理杂志》2008年第1期51-53,共3页Chinese Journal of Pathophysiology
摘 要:目的:评估健康志愿者临床试验前后的焦虑与抑郁水平,探讨产生焦虑与抑郁情绪的影响因素及积极应对方式。方法:对35例健康志愿者进行焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和艾森克个性问卷(EPQ)测定。结果:(1)健康志愿者参加临床试验前SAS标准分为35.40±9.64,与常模组33.80±5.80相比有升高趋势,但无显著差异,P>0.05;与试验后30.94±6.15比较,P<0.05,有显著差异。(2)试验前后SDS标准分别为35.17±6.93、34.91±6.74;P>0.05,无显著差异;均低于常模组。(3)健康志愿者人格特征与焦虑和抑郁情绪之间具有相关性:艾森克个性问卷(EPQ)量表中的N、P得分与SAS、SDS均有显著性相关,r=0.338/0.608和0.335/0.455(P<0.05);而E分与SAS、SDS得分相关不明显。人格特质是影响焦虑水平的重要因素。结论:健康志愿者在接受临床试验前后会产生焦虑情绪,个性特征与精神状态密切相关。AIM : To assess the mental health level of anxiety and depression and related factors in healthy volunteers in clinic trial. METHODS: Self- rating anxiety scale ( SAS), self - rating depressive scale (SDS) and Eysenck personality question (EPQ) were applied to thirty -five patients. RESULTS: Among the 35 patients, the SAS standard mean value was 35.40 ± 9. 64, which was higher than that of nation - norm ( P 〉 0. 05 ), and significantly higher than that of volunteers after trials (P 〈0. 05). The SDS standard mean value was 35. 17±6.93 beforetrials and 34. 91±6. 93 after trials, which was lower than that of nation - norm. As compared with nation - norm, EPQ scores of intro - and extro - version were significantly lower, and neuroticism and psycho were all significantly higher (P 〈0. 05, P 〈0. 01 ). It showed that the standard mean values of SAS and SDS before trials were positively related to EPQ P and N score. CONCLUSION : Mental problems existed in healthy volunteers on clinic trials and the occurrence of mental problems are related to their personality characteristic and sociological factors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188