检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《美中国际创伤杂志》2007年第4期16-17,共2页U.S.Chinese International Journal of Traumatology
摘 要:目的:比较0.75%布比卡因和0.75%左旋布比卡因用于术后硬膜外止痛的的镇痛效果与安全性。方法:选择ASA分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级下肢手术接受术后硬膜外镇痛的病人50例,随机分为2组:A组(n=25)用0.75%布比卡因;B组(n=25)用0.75%左旋布比卡因行术后硬膜外自控镇痛,观察患者12h、24h和48h的镇痛效果、镇痛满意程度、各组药物需求量(PCA按压次数×0.5ml)以及有关的副作用。结果:两组均可达到完善的镇痛效果,均无剧痛病例,B组药物需求量(PCA按压次数×0.5m1)多于A组(P〈0.05),均未见局麻药毒性反应和并发症。结论:0.75%布比卡因用于术后硬膜外镇痛,其镇痛效果优于0.75%左旋布比卡因。Objective: To compare the effects and safety of 0.75% Bupivaciane and 0.75% Levobupivacaine in epidural analgesia after operation. Methods: 50 ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ adults scheduled for lower extremities surgery were divided into two groups. Group A and B (25 cases in each group) received 0.75% Bupivacaine and 0.75% Levobupivacaine respectivly for PCA. To observe the analgesia effects, satisfactory degree, dosage (times of PCA pressed ~0.Sml) and side effects at 12h,24h and 48h after operation. Results: There was no difference between the two groups in the analgesia effects. No toxic reaction and complications were observed in all cases. But the dosage (times of PCA pressed×0.5ml) in group B was more than that in group A (P〈0.05). Conclusion: The analgesia effect of 0.75% Bupivacaine is superior to that of 0.75% Levobupivacaine.
关 键 词:0.75%布比卡因 0.75%左旋布比卡因 硬膜外镇痛
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145