检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王瑞君[1]
机构地区:[1]山东大学威海分校法学院
出 处:《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2008年第1期130-135,共6页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:与政治上专制相对应,人类社会早期的刑法,其干预广泛,裁判者自由裁量权大,法律道德主义盛行,刑法呈现压制型特征;近代以降,自治型刑法逐渐成为主导性的刑法模式,在观念、功能、原则、规则、司法运作等方面呈现出不同于压制型刑法的特点。我国当下刑法正艰难地从压制型刑法走出,其艰难表现为观念层面的压制型,原则、规则层面自治型的不彻底性。于是,在以法治国背景下,建构自治型刑法当是我们的选择。Corresponding to political autocracy, the criminal law took on the pattern of suppression and characteristics of great intervention, great power of free judge, population of legal morality in the early history of human society. Since modern era, the criminal law of autonomy is becoming the dominant style of criminal law, and it takes on new characteristics, which is different from criminal law of suppression, in idea, effect, principle, regulation, and judicial implementation. Now our criminal law is changing from suppression into autonomy arduously, it is suppressive in idea and it is not autonomic in principle and regulation, so it is our choice to form our autonomic criminal law against the context of rule by law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.19.255.255