检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安石油大学经济管理学院
出 处:《天然气工业》2007年第12期144-146,共3页Natural Gas Industry
基 金:陕西省教育厅专项科研计划项目"作业成本法在陕西延长油公司油气开采中的应用问题研究"(编号:06JK077)的阶段性成果
摘 要:油气企业对单井效益评价方法中收益与成本指标的应用还存在着模糊的认识。为此,在介绍单井效益评价方法中的收益与成本指标的基础上,将其运用于某油气田的单井效益评价,并与单井效益评价中的日产油气量和综合含水率指标运用的结果进行了对比分析。结果表明,只依据日产油气量或综合含水率指标对单井效益进行评价,可能导致油气田管理效率不高,甚至可能得出错误的结论。分析认为,单井效益评价中应采用收益与成本指标来确定油气井是否有效;对有效井的效益评价,应综合考虑企业的内外环境来选择使用相应的效益评价方法,或者综合应用多种方法。Up till now little knowledge was recognized by oil and gas companies on profit and cost evaluation indexes on a single well and their application. Hereby based on the brief introduction about the profit and cost in the profit evaluation method on a single well, this study used it at a certain oil and gas field, and carried out comparative analysis on the differences between profit + cost and the daily oil and gas production + composite water cut. This study result showed that if a single well profit was judged only by the daily oil and gas production and composite water cut, a wrong conclusion might mislead the operators or managers in the end; and the indexes of profit and cost could be reasonable to evaluate on a single well profit and so as to judge if this well was cost-efficient or not, if cost-efficient enough a corresponding evaluation method or multiple methods should be taken fully into consideration under both internal and external environment of an individual oil and gas company.
分 类 号:TE331.1[石油与天然气工程—油气田开发工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3