检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李一花[1]
出 处:《广东商学院学报》2008年第1期12-18,24,共8页Journal of Guangdong University of Business Studies
基 金:国家社科基金项目(05CJY029)
摘 要:中国的收入分配悬殊已到了非常严峻的地步。实现公平正义的分配是建设和谐社会的当务之急。从起点公平、规则公平、结果公平的含义分析出发,对功利主义、自由主义、罗尔斯主义等观点进行考察后发现,诺齐克崇尚权利的"持有正义论"与罗尔斯的"最少受惠者福利最大化"两种理论的结合,对我国和谐社会下的公平分配具有较强的借鉴意义。具体而言,当前中国分配政策的制定和调整应致力于机会均等、权利保障和保护弱势群体三个方面。The income distribution with a wide gap in China has already reached a very severe stage. It has become a top-priority task to realize the justice of distribution in the construction of a harmonious society. This paper begins with the analysis of the meanings about starting-point justice, rule justice and result justice, followed by a review over utilitarianism ,liberalism and Rawlsianism, and finds out that the combination of Rawls' Welfare Theory about "Maximizing the welfare of a least beneficiary" and Nozick' s "justice holding theory" has valuable referential use for the fair distribution in the harmonious society of our country, To put it specifically, the formulation and adjustment of China' s distribution policy at present should be devoted to offering equal opportunities, safeguarding rights and protecting the disadvantaged groups.
关 键 词:公平分配 和谐社会 机会均等 权利保障 弱势群体
分 类 号:D61[政治法律—政治学] F124.7[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.116