“公平分配”的理念纷争及其对构建和谐社会的启示  

Ideological Disputes over Fair Income Distribution and Their Revelations to the Contruction of Harmonious Society

作　　者：李一花[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学经济学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《广东商学院学报》2008年第1期12-18,24,共8页Journal of Guangdong University of Business Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(05CJY029)

摘　　要：中国的收入分配悬殊已到了非常严峻的地步。实现公平正义的分配是建设和谐社会的当务之急。从起点公平、规则公平、结果公平的含义分析出发,对功利主义、自由主义、罗尔斯主义等观点进行考察后发现,诺齐克崇尚权利的"持有正义论"与罗尔斯的"最少受惠者福利最大化"两种理论的结合,对我国和谐社会下的公平分配具有较强的借鉴意义。具体而言,当前中国分配政策的制定和调整应致力于机会均等、权利保障和保护弱势群体三个方面。The income distribution with a wide gap in China has already reached a very severe stage. It has become a top-priority task to realize the justice of distribution in the construction of a harmonious society. This paper begins with the analysis of the meanings about starting-point justice, rule justice and result justice, followed by a review over utilitarianism ,liberalism and Rawlsianism, and finds out that the combination of Rawls＇ Welfare Theory about ＂Maximizing the welfare of a least beneficiary＂ and Nozick＇ s ＂justice holding theory＂ has valuable referential use for the fair distribution in the harmonious society of our country, To put it specifically, the formulation and adjustment of China＇ s distribution policy at present should be devoted to offering equal opportunities, safeguarding rights and protecting the disadvantaged groups.

关 键 词：公平分配 和谐社会 机会均等 权利保障 弱势群体 

分 类 号：D61[政治法律—政治学] F124.7[政治法律—中外政治制度]