检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐兰[1] 朱西娥[1] 李仕明[1] 史国珍[1] 梁乙安[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军空军总医院内分泌科
出 处:《中华老年医学杂志》1997年第4期203-205,共3页Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
摘 要:目的了解老年人糖尿病足坏疽(DF)的临床特征及其危险因素。方法对221例老年和163例老年前期DF的患病率、各种诱因的百分比、DF和非DF患者胫后感觉神经传导速度、双下肢动脉管径和血流量等检测结果进行分析。结果(1)老年和老年前期DF患者的患病率(49.5%和27.4%)明显高于青中年组(11.0%);自发性溃疡、水疱破裂、穿鞋不当摩擦伤为DF的常见诱因;湿性坏疽为DF的主要类型。(2)老年和老年前期DF患者因周围神经病变致传导速度检测不能引出波形者分别占92%和82%、周围血管病变致动脉狭窄和闭塞者分别占92%和78%,显著高于非DF组。结论老年人糖尿病易合并DF;周围神经病变和周围血管病变在DF的发生和发展中起重要作用。Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors of diabetic foot (DF) in senile and presenile patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods The prevalance rates of DF in 221 senile and 163 presenile patients and the percentage of precipitating factors for DF were analysed. Peripheral neuropathy(PN) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) in senile and presenile patients with DF and without DF were compared through measuring their posterior tibialis sensory nerve conduction velocity and their internal diameter and volume flow of the arteries of the lower extremities. Results Prevalance rates of DF in senile and presenile (49 5% and 27 4%) were significantly higher than that in younger group(11 0%). Spontaneous ulcer, blister rupture, rubbing of foot were the most common precipitating factors for DF. Wet gangrene was a main type of DF.The analysis of risk factors showed that PN and PVD were more common and serious in patients with DF than in those without DF. Conclusions Senile and presenile patients with DM are more sufferd from DF; PN and PVD play important role in development of DF.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28