“重文”分析法评析  

Comments on the Methodology of Analyzing the Repeated Texts

作　　者：李锐[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学历史学院史学研究所讲师,北京100875

出　　处：《清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第1期127-134,共8页Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：2006年度教育部人文社会科学青年项目“战国秦汉时期的‘学派’研究”(06JC770002)。

摘　　要：先秦、秦汉古书中间多有"重文",学者们或利用"重文"进行校勘、训诂的分析工作,或利用"重文"分析文献篇章的先后关系,进而辨伪、讨论学派等。郎瑛的"秦汉书多同"较早讨论了这一问题,后来章学诚提出了著名的"言公"之说。他们的结论应该是我们对待古书"重文"的基本态度。我们可以利用"重文"进行校勘、训诂,但是超出了校勘、训诂而进行分析年代、辨伪等的工作是不合适的,里面存在错误的预设和不适当的前提,所谓"重文"分析的通则也是有疑问的。由出土文献看,应该更多地运用"同出一源说"对待古书中的"重文"现象。There are great deal of repeated texts in the ancient books during the periods from the pre-Qin to the Han Dynasty. Some scholars often use them to emend or explain the books; others deduce the early or late of the texts, even to conclude that some are copies or belong to some school. LANG Ying has talked about why there are so many repeated texts for a long time, and ZHANG Xue-cheng has published his famous point that there are public sentences in ancient times later. Their conclusions should be the basic attitude of us to the repeated texts. According to the unearthed documents, we should deal the repeated texts with the viewpoint that they are coming from the same source.

关 键 词：重文 言公 同出一源说 

分 类 号：K207[历史地理—历史学]