检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《工业工程与管理》2008年第1期57-61,共5页Industrial Engineering and Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70471042)
摘 要:对drop-shipping模式和传统模式(零售商制定库存决策并持有库存)进行了对比研究,研究发现尽管采用drop-shipping模式后库存风险由零售商转移到供应商,但这并不一定能够带来零售商利润的提高,还得出了零售商愿意采用drop-shipping模式的条件。即使直接采用drop-shipping模式后零售商以及整个供应链的利润都不增加,在某些条件下还是可以找到合适的混合策略使得零售商的利润上升。In this paper, drop-shipping model and traditional model (the retailer decides the inventory level and keeps the inventory) are compared. Although drop-shipping requires transfer of demand uncertainty risk from retailer to vendor, changing the supply chain system from the traditional one to drop-shipping does not necessarily lead to a higher expected payoff for retailer. Besides the conditions under which retailer will switch traditional model to drop-shipping model is found. Sometimes, even if the expected payoffs of retailer and the total supply chain are both smaller in drop-shipping channel than in the traditional channel, it is still possible for retailer to achieve higher payoffs by adopting hybrid strategy.
关 键 词:供应链管理 Drop—shipping 库存
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80