检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黎行山[1] 黄美兴[1] 杨晓[1] 向思英[1]
出 处:《中国药房》2008年第5期323-324,共2页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:比较2种用药方案治疗慢性无菌性前列腺炎的经济学效果。方法:103例慢性无菌性前列腺炎患者随机分成2组,分别给予口服前列通淤胶囊+前列安栓纳肛(A组)、前列安栓纳肛(B组)治疗,疗程均为30d,运用成本-效果分析法进行评价。结果:A、B组总成本分别为592.2、280.8元,总有效率分别为92.31%、82.35%(P>0.05)。结论:B组方案患者依从性好,更经济。OBJECTIVE:To compare the pharmacoeconomic efficacy between 2 therapeutic schemes for chronic abacterial prostatitis. METHODS :A total of 103 patients with chronic abacterial prostatitis were randomly assigned to receive Qianlietongyu plus Prostant(Group A) or Prostant alone(Group B) for 30 days.A cost effectiveness analysis was conducted for the evaluation of the two schemes .RESULTS:The total costs of Group A vs.Group B were 592.2yuan vs. 280.8yuan, and the effective rates were 92.31 vs. 82.35% (P 〉0.05). CONCLUSION:Scheme B has better compliance and is more economical as compared with scheme A.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30