检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯黎升[1] 阮狄克[1] 徐云可[2] 何勍[1] 林井付[3] 叶晓健[4] 赵书臣[3] 徐成[1] 辛洪奎[1]
机构地区:[1]北京海军总医院骨科,100037 [2]北京海军总医院放疗科,100037 [3]北京海军总医院放射科,100037 [4]上海长征医院骨科
出 处:《解剖与临床》2008年第1期8-12,共5页Anatomy and Clinics
基 金:海军总医院攻关课题
摘 要:目的:对下颈椎椎弓根四壁及入口毗邻结构的皮质厚度行影像学测量,为临床椎弓根钉植入提供参考。方法:对8例新鲜颈椎进行DR摄片和螺旋CT扫描重建,在AutoCAD软件中测量CT图像显示的椎弓根四壁及入口处毗邻结构(包括上关节突前壁(ACS)、椎板前壁(ACL)、下关节突前壁(ACI)和横突孔后壁(PCT))的皮质厚度,并行统计学分析。结果:双斜位DR片示颈椎椎弓根内壁(MCP)、上壁(SCP)、下壁(ICP)皮质较厚,而外壁(LCP)菲薄。统计学分析发现同一颈椎的MCP、SCP、ICP、ACL、ACS和ACI之间的厚度无差别,LCP和PCT皮质菲薄,明显薄于前6项指标。MCP、SCP、ICP、ACS和PCT在C3~7间的厚度无差别,PCTc明显小于其它4项指标。结论:同一颈椎PCT和LCP明显薄于其它各项指标,提示PCT和LCP抵抗外力强度最小,MCP、SCP、ICP和ACS在C3~7间厚度无差别,提示其在不同颈椎间抵抗外力可能一致。颈椎椎弓根钉固定时应该避免靠近PCT和LCP。Objective:Cortex thicknesses of subaxial cervical pedicle entry's circumferential structures were measured on planar CT images to provide quantitative data for cervical pedicle screw insertion. Methods: Eight subaxial cervical spine specimens were collected from fresh cadavers. Projectional Digital Radiography (DR) and multi - slice spiral CT volumetric scanning were done on each specimen from C3 to C7. Raw transaxial sectional CT images were then reconstructed by interpolation reconstruction method. The thickness of median, superior, lateral and inferior cortex of pedicle (MCP, SCP, LCP and ICP, respectively), thickness of anterior cortex of lamina (ACL) adjacent to MCP, anterior cortex of superior articularis (ACS) adjacent to SCP, posterior cortex of transverse foramen (PCT) adjacent to LCP and anterior cortex of inferior articularis (ACI) adjacent to ICP were then measured in AutoCAD2000 Software as raster images. Results:Oblique DR images showed subaxial cervical pedicle' s sagittal and coronal projections clearly, which indicated qualitatively MCP, SCP and ICP were thicker than their corresponding LCP. Quantitative measurement on CT muhiplanar images found SCP, MCP, ICP, ACS, ACL and ACI were not significantly different, while LCP and PCT were not significantly different, but the former six indexes were significantly thicker than the latter two on the same vertebra. SCP, MCP, ICP, ACS and PCT were not significantly different among different cervical vertebrae and could be combined together, respectively. SCPc and ICPc were statistically thicker than ACSc, MCPc and ACSc were statistically thicker than PCTc. Conclusions: SCP, MCP, ICP, ACS and PCT were not significantly different among different cervical vertebrae, which might implicate they have similar resistance to exotic force, respectively. The results that SCPc and ICPc were statistically thicker than ACSc, MCPc and ACSc were statistically thicker than PCTc might implicate PCTc had the weakest resistance to exotic for
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.32