论国际法上的分离权  

On Secession Right of International Law

作　　者：范宏云[1] 

机构地区：[1]深圳市委党校,广东深圳518034

出　　处：《武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第1期121-125,共5页Wuhan University Journal：Philosophy & Social Science

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(04JZD0015)

摘　　要：国际法的自决与国家的主权和领土完整并不会产生冲突,而分离与国家主权和领土完整具有不可调和的对抗性,自决不包括分离。分离权实质上是属于主权国家对其治下的一部分领土和居民的处置权;国内分离实体的分离企图和行为,因为严重危害国家的主权和领土完整,从而在根本上违背了国际法的基本原则,所以国际法不可能发展出一种所谓由分离实体所享有的分离权。Self-determination in international law is not in crush with the two concepts of sovereignty and territory integrity. But secession right is in contradictory with the above two. Self-determination does not include secession right at all. The essence of secession right is that states own the right to depose part of its territory and citizens under control. However any secession entity＇s wish and action break the basic principles of international law because of its harm to the sovereignty and territory integrity. As a result it is impossible for international law to develop a so-called secession right enjoyed by the secession entity.

关 键 词：分离权 自决权 分离实体 

分 类 号：D063[政治法律—政治学] D99